The letter alleges that Dentsu’ investment branch Amplifi “illegally swept approximately $17 million from the festival bank account” on April 29, the same day that Dentsu surprised Lang by announcing that they had unilaterally canceled the festival. (Last week Variety published an article examining  this and several other Woodstock 50 issues.)
After we exercised our contractual right to take over, and subsequently, cancel the festival, we simply recovered the funds in the festival bank account, funds which we originally put in as financial partner. Beyond that we stand by our original statement that we made last week.” Further, tickets cannot go on sale for an event prior to obtaining a mass gathering permit, which has still not been granted. A rep for Dentsu-Aegis dismissed Lang’s claim that the money was taken illegally, saying in a statement provided to Variety: “As financial partner, we had the customary rights one would expect to protect a large investment.
We look forward to addressing that in court this afternoon.” Reached by Variety, a rep for the festival replied, “While Dentsu has used its filing to sling mud, nothing in its court papers changes the fact that Dentsu has no right under its agreement with Woodstock 50 to either cancel the Festival or abscond with nearly $18 million of the Festival’s money.
Referencing Dentsu’s investment arm, Amplifi Live, attorney  Marc L. Greenwald wrote in part: “Amplifi Live worked nonstop for the last 10 months and invested millions of dollars to put on the Woodstock 50th anniversary festival in Watkins Glen this August.
Last week, Lang wrote Dentsu a letter asking that the company “honor the law and your obligations, stop interfering with our efforts to put on this wonderful event and return the $17 million you improperly took.”
The injunction sought by W50, even if there were a legal basis for it, cannot change that.” As much as the parties might wish it otherwise, the festival contemplated by their agreement cannot happen and allowing it to go forward would only put the public at risk. The production company has quit, no permits have been issued, necessary roadwork has not begun, and there is no prospect for sufficient financing. “But Woodstock 50 LLC’s and Michael Lang’s misrepresentations, incompetence, and contractual breaches have made it impossible to produce a high-quality event that is safe and secure for concertgoers, artists, and staff.
 ” />
The judge in the $18 million lawsuit pitting the organizers of the troubled Woodstock 50 festival against their former finance partner, Dentsu Aegis, adjourned without a decision this afternoon and said he will take 20 to 36 hours to rule, a rep for the festival tells Variety. Dentsu is seeking an emergency injunction over nearly $18 million for the event, which is scheduled to take place at the Watkins Glen International speedway August 16-18 — just three months from now — but has yet to obtain the necessary permits, put tickets on sale or secure a new financial partner.
Lawyers for Dentsu slammed festival organizer Michael Lang in legal documents filed before the hearing began on Monday. The lawsuit has grown bitter in recent weeks, as the former partners have harshly criticized each other in public statements.